22 Jul 21 As you have by now realized I've gone with a triptych of these ghost trees and an opportunity to talk a bit about each version. Over the years I've had an ongoing friendly debate with a couple of members WRT my photography being that of an artist. For the most part I've strongly rejected that idea, but of late have come to accept that, depending on perspective, it may be true. Certainly with all the creative versions of the images that is not debatable. It is with the straight versions that I have found this application of artist as misapplied. But of late I've come to the conclusion that all of the photography I share is art; why the change of heart? The answer is that with each image I make slight adjustments to what the camera has recorded to render the capture closer to what I was seeing/feeling/experiencing. In other words attempting to convey to the observer what moved me to take that image in the first place. That is true for every press of the shutter, not just the few frames I share. I'm sharing a paragraph from a book I'm reading that goes like this: "The three most important elements in artistic creation are representation, creation, and communication. All artistic creations contain a theme, that is, the message the artist seeks to communicate, regardless of the form the work takes -- whether it be a poem, painting, statue, photograph, novel, play, dance, or film. The artist delivers the theme to the hearts of the reader, viewer, or listener. This process is the communication -- the transmission of the artist's mind to the recipient." As I've stated many times since I began these mailings my only goal, which I imagine equates to a theme, is to share the magnificence of God's creation, thus I must be guilty of the moniker artist. It's taken me a long time to come to terms with this idea, that of being an artist, but I guess it is true. That should please a couple of you. As recipients of these mailings I would imagine that you too can further the artist concept by what you may chose to do with them, say arranging them into a sets of 3 (triptych) of which you would have six choices I believe. And of course that arrangement could be continuously rearranged to suit the mood.
Same info as for the other two versions, this time the conversion being made with the Topaz plug-in Impression 2. Turnerized Nikon D500; 18 - 200; Aperture Priority; ISO 200; 1/1,000 sec @ f / 9.